Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Mcdonald vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Mackenzie Mcdonald
Mackenzie Mcdonald

Flag USA USA

w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Flag HKG HKG

l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

30
Age
21
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
112
C. Rank
151
37
Best Rank
128
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.5M
Career Money
$539.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Mcdonald 1 - 0 Wong

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0. The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 28-09-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Mcdonald1
Wong0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(SFNonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-28-24)

Hard
USA Flag
Mackenzie Mcdonald
6
6
HKG Flag
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
3
4

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

Stats
$3,450,170Career Prize Money$538,970
55.94% (353-278)Career Total W/L55.78% (164-130)
1Hard0
6Titles2
1Total H2H Matches0
37.04% (10-17)YTD Win/Loss45.45% (5-6)

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 44.00% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mackenzie Mcdonald, in recent form, has won 43.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 44.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.58% and 22.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Mackenzie Mcdonald has saved 54.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 56.34% of matches played (W/L 40/31), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Mackenzie Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 229/161), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 23/39). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
  • Player level: In the last year, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/12), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 1 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 2 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0.
  • The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 28-09-2024, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:54.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mackenzie Mcdonald has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.51 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.05.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mackenzie Mcdonald has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Mackenzie Mcdonald has converted 33.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won7
7Aces (Total)5
3Total Double Faults2
1:11:54Average Match Time1:11:54
74% (43/58)1st Serve %62% (32/52)
86% (37/43)1st Serve Win %69% (22/32)
53% (8/15)2nd Serve Win %55% (11/20)
50% (2/4)Break Pts Won %0% (0/2)
37% (19/52)Return Points Win %22% (13/58)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Mcdonald 52%, Wong 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mcdonald 52%, Wong 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Mcdonald 61%, Wong 59%.

M. Mcdonald Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardHellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025

R1

ARGT. Martin
L
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3

Q3

JPNS. Mochizuki
W
4-6 6-2 6-2

Q1

ARGM. Trungelliti
W
2-6 6-2 7-5
I.hardBratislava 2 Challenger - 27-10-2025

R2

LUXC. Rodesch
L
7-6(2) 5-7 7-5

R1

PORJ. Faria
W
6-3 7-6(6)

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardTaipei Challenger - 03-11-2025

SF

AUSJ. Duckworth
L
6-3 6-4

QF

FRAM. Janvier
W
6-4 6-4

R2

TPET. Huang
W
6-4 6-4

R1

SUIL. Castelnuovo
W
6-4 4-6 7-5
HardSeoul Challenger - 27-10-2025

F

JPNS. Shimabukuro
L
6-4 6-3
banner

M. Mcdonald vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
55.94% (353/278)YTD Win/Loss55.78% (164/130)
55.31% (849/686)Sets Win/Loss54.07% (372/316)
51.92% (7634/7070)Games Win/Loss51.16% (3419/3264)
58.72% (229/161)Hard Win/Loss58.90% (129/90)
37.10% (23/39)Clay Win/Loss46.51% (20/23)
57.14% (60/45)Indoor Hard W/L50.00% (9/9)
55.41% (41/33)Grass Win/Loss42.86% (6/8)
0.37Aces Per Game0.52
2633Aces Total1687
0.2Double Faults Per Game0.18
1432Total Double Faults603
1:33:41Average Match Time1:31:40
408.37Average Opponent Rank371.21
63% (27359/43123)1st Serve %60% (11331/18739)
70% (19126/27359)1st Serve Win %71% (8054/11331)
51% (8101/15764)2nd Serve Win %49% (3631/7408)
42% (1721/4077)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (703/1718)
39% (17036/44007)Return Points Win %38% (7230/18830)
48.48% (32/34)Slam W/L53.33% (8/7)
47.25% (43/48)Masters W/L46.67% (7/8)
80.00% (4/1)Cups W/L62.50% (5/3)
48.92% (91/95)Main Tour W/L27.27% (3/8)
63.68% (142/81)Challenger W/L55.65% (69/55)
68.33% (41/19)Futures W/L59.50% (72/49)
57% (329/577)Best of 3 Sets Win %55% (157/286)
42% (21/50)Best of 5 Sets Win %83% (5/6)
50% (105/210)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (56/102)
46% (89/193)Deciding Set Win %54% (51/94)
80% (369/297)1st Set Won, Won Match87% (157/136)
20% (369/72)1st Set Won, Lost Match13% (157/21)
21% (262/56)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (137/27)